Lately, I've been thinking about 'potential relationships': the relationships that look like they have the possibility of being something, but become nothing.
Or, the relationships where we are sure that the other person is into us, but nothing transpires. Then, that becomes the start of billions of questions of wondering if that person really did like us in the first place.
As you can imagine, this is very frustrating.... with a 95% chance of a person's head exploding from the continued thoughts and analyses.
The feedback we are getting from our love interest is all very...well, wishy-washy. Plus, it doesn't give us much satisfaction if we have to guess all the time about someone's affections. Abraham-Hicks has a excellent analogy stating that, when you are aligned to that other person (and vice versa), wild horses couldn't keep you, or them, away. View the video here: Wild Horses
So, my questions is: Would you prefer to have someone who adores you and you adore them?
Or, would you rather try to convince someone, who is only half-interested in you, that you are worthy enough to be adored?
This goes back to my previous blog post Your Brilliant Light and how we tend to settle because we feel inadequate and not good enough for something better.
Perhaps, we settle for less because we are afraid of change; afraid of searching for something more. C. Joybell C says this quite eloquently:
“We can't be afraid of change. You may feel very secure in the pond that you are in, but if you never venture out of it, you will never know that there is such a thing as an ocean, a sea. Holding onto something that is good for you now, may be the very reason why you don't have something better.”
Wait for the Wild Horses.
Namaste.
No comments:
Post a Comment